The Transition to School project: Results from the classroom

Philippa McTaggart
Parenting and Family Support Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD

Matthew R Sanders
Parenting and Family Support Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD

PP: 144 - 155

Abstract

Conduct problems in children are common, and are associated with significant costs to the family, schools, and society at large. Behavioural Family Intervention (BFI), which targets family interactions, is known to be one of the most effective interventions for the management of child behaviour problems.

The school environment is an important aspect of a child's life, and the degree to which parenting interventions impact on the children's classroom behaviour has not been adequately assessed. The present research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a parenting intervention, namely The Positive Parenting Program - Triple P, in reducing child behaviour problems in the classroom. Year One teachers at 25 state primary schools in Brisbane completed a standardised teacher report measure of child behaviour on all children in their classrooms (n=495 children in control schools, n=490 children at intervention schools).

Compared to control schools, the levels of teacher reported conduct problems were significantly lower in the intervention schools. The results of this study provide evidence that a parent training program such as Triple P can be effective in reducing the impact of child behaviour problems in the classroom.

Keywords

parenting, classroom behaviour, teachers, Behavioural Family Intervention (BFI)

Article Text

The development of child conduct problems has consistently been linked with poor parental supervision and erratic child management strategies. For this reason, training parents to use more effective parenting strategies would seem an effective way to reduce these problems (Farrington 1994; Webster-Stratton & Hammond 1997). Such parent training programs are known as Behavioural Family Interventions (BFI) and are acknowledged as being the most effective, well researched and cost effective method of preventing child behaviour problems (Christensen, Johnson, Phillips & Glasgow 1980; Kazdin 1987; Kazdin 1993; Serketich & Dumas 1996; Taylor & Biglan 1998).

There are several key features of BFI interventions, most significantly their focus on training parents to implement specific behaviours in the home. The aim is to provide parents with instruction in the use of social learning and behavioural principles to enable them to generalise their skills to other settings and children (Kazdin 1996). The underlying model is one of collaboration that sees a non-blaming, supporting and reciprocal relationship between therapist and parent as essential to success (Webster-Stratton & Herbert 1993). The rationale is that a treatment approach that encourages parents to develop solutions to their problems themselves will enhance parents' sense of competency. Parental self-efficacy is seen as a mediating factor between a parent's theoretical knowledge and their behaviour, hence increasing the long-term success of treatment.

As children commence academic learning, new risk factors relating to school performance and peer relationships can increase the likelihood of a child developing conduct problems and compromise the effects of earlier intervention. The well being of children, their families and the school community depends on an effective partnership between home and school.

There are a number of reasons for the development of conduct problems in the school setting. These problems are generally an extension of the conduct problems seen in the home, and the risk factors that contribute to these problems at home also operate in the classroom. Often, for children who have displayed conduct problems at home, the introduction of the classroom setting provides further opportunities to behave in a disruptive manner (Patterson, DeBaryshe & Ramsey, 1989). In most cases, children displaying antisocial behaviours prior to the commencement of school make relatively poor adjustments to the school setting.

Interventions aimed at enhancing family relationships and reducing the chaotic environment in which many at-risk children live is seen by researchers as the best option for assisting these children to achieve at school.

BFI has shown impressive results in terms of improved behaviour at home. In general, BFI evaluation research has shown that parents report high levels of overall satisfaction with the program (McMahon 1999; Webster-Stratton 1993; Williams, Zubrick, Silburn & Sanders 1997). Parents generally report that the intervention has resulted in statistically significant reductions in the non-compliance of their child (eg, Patterson, Cobb & Ray 1973; Webster-Stratton 1981; Wierson & Forehand 1994; Williams et al. 1997). These treatment gains are generally still evident at one-year follow-up (eg. Webster-Stratton 1996).

Despite these impressive results in the home, there is little evidence to suggest that these improvements in children's behaviour generalise to school. There are a small number of studies that have examined the effects of parent training on at-school behaviour, but few have found any improvements in school behaviour following parent training (Breiner & Forehand 1981; Webster-Stratton 1993; Webster-Stratton 1998). It is unlikely that changes will occur in the school setting if the intervention is not powerful enough even to create changes at home (McNeil et al. 1991).

There is, however, one study that has shown evidence of generalisation to school without any intervention taking place within the school environment (McNeil, et al. 1991). This was the first controlled group study to show changes in both parent and teacher reports of child behaviour following a specific parenting intervention. The study provided Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) to parents of children who were showing significant conduct problems. The study found that generalisation of treatment effects to school occurred for existing high levels of conduct problem and oppositional behaviour. It did not occur for hyperactivity, inattention and peer relationships.

In summary, although behavioural parent training has been shown to be extremely effective in reducing child behaviour problems in the home, evidence to support the generalisation of this improved child behaviour to the classroom has been limited and has provided conflicting information (Funderburk et al. 1998; Little & Hudson 1998).

The current paper is one in a series of publications that report on the results of the Transition to School Project on reducing the risk factors for the development of child behaviour problems, the overall behaviour of children at home, and the behaviour of children in the classroom. The current paper aims to determine the contribution of family intervention to improving children's behaviour at school. Determining the impact of parenting intervention on school behaviour is an essential step in increasing our knowledge about the generalisation of the effects of parenting intervention to the classroom, and the impact of children's home-life on their school behaviour. The current study tests the hypothesis that parent training (Triple P - The Positive Parenting Program) provided in a universal fashion to all parents at participating schools will have the effect of reducing the degree and intensity of behaviour problems shown by children in the classroom. It is hypothesised that the Triple P will result in generalisation of behaviour change to the classroom, both because of the efficacy of the program, and the general nature of its content. The research will test the statement made by Little and Hudson (1998) that it 'would be of interest to determine whether generalisation to school will also occur with [the] BFI [program of Sanders and Dadds (1993)]' (p.215).

... continues ...


View references

References

Alexander KL and Entwisle DR (1996) Family involvement in adolescents' schooling. In A Booth and JF Dunn (Eds) Family School Links: How do they Affect Educational Outcomes, pp.67-88. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Blechman EA (1996) Coping, competence and aggression prevention: Part 2. Universal school-based prevention. Applied & Preventive Psychology 5, 19-35.

Breiner JL and Forehand R (1981) An assessment of the effects of parent training on clinic-referred children's school behavior. Behavioral Assessment 3, 31-42.

Burns GL and Patterson DR (2001) Normative data on the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory and Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory: Parent and teacher rating scales of disruptive behavior problems in children and adolescents. Child and Family Behavior Therapy 23(1), 15-28.

Burns GL, Walsh JA and Owen SM (1995) Twelve-month stability of disruptive classroom behavior as measured by the Sutter-Eyeberg Student Behavior Inventory. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 24(4), 453-462.

Christensen A, Johnson SM, Phillips S and Glasgow RE (1980) Cost effectiveness in behavioral family therapy. Behavior Therapy 11, 208-226.

Cunningham CE (1996) Improving availability, utilization and cost efficacy of parent training programs for children with disruptive behavior disorders. In RD Peters and RJ McMahon (Eds) Preventing Childhood Disorders, Substance Abuse, and Delinquency. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Dishion TJ, Patterson GR and Kavanagh KA (1992) An experimental test of the coercive model: linking theory, measurement and intervention. In J McCord and RE Tremblay (Eds) Preventing Antisocial Behavior: Interventions from Birth to Adolescence. New York: Guilford Press.

Farrington DP (1994) Early developmental prevention of juvenile delinquency. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health 4, 209-227.

Funderburk BW, Eyberg SM, Newcomb K, McNeil CB, Hembree-Kigin T and Capage L (1998) Parent-child interaction therapy with behaviour problem children: Maintenance of treatment effects in the school setting. Child and Family Behaviour Therapy 20(2), 17-38.

Gross DG, Fogg L, Webster-Stratton C, Garvey C, Julion W and Grady J (2003) Parent training of toddlers in day care in low-income urban communities. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 71, 261-278.

Jacobson NS and Truax P (1991) Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59(1), 12-19.

Kamps DM and Tankersley M (1996) Prevention of behavioral and conduct disorders: Trends and research issues. Behavioral Disorders 22(1), 41-48.

Kazdin AE (1987) Conduct Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence. London: Sage Publications.

Kazdin AE (1993) Treatment of conduct disorder: Progress and directions in psychotherapy research. Development and Psychopathology 5, 277-310.

Kazdin AE (1996) Problem solving and parent management in treating aggressive and antisocial behaviour. In ED Hibbs and PS Jensen (Eds) Psychosocial Treatments for Child and Adolescent Disorders: Empirically-based Strategies for Clinical Practice. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Little E and Hudson A (1998) Conduct problems and treatment across home and school: A review of the literature. Behaviour Change 15(4), 213-227.

Louden LW, et al (1985) Disruptive behavior in schools: Report of the Ministerial Working Party appointed by the Minister for Education and Planning in Western Australia. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.

Markie-Dadds C, Turner KMT and Sanders MR (1997) Every Parent's Group Workbook. Brisbane: Families International Publishing.

McMahon RJ (1999) Parent training. In SW Russ and T Ollendick (Eds) Handbook of Psychotherapies with Children and Families, pp.153-180. New York: Plennum Press.

McMahon RJ and Forehand RL (1983) Consumer satisfaction in behavioral treatment of children: Types, issues and recommendations. Behavior Therapy 14, 209-225.

McNeil CB, Eyberg S, Eisenstadt TH, Newcomb K and Funderburk B (1991) Parent-child interaction therapy with behavior problem children: Generalization of treatment effects to the school setting. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 20(2), 140-151.

Miller GE, Brehm K and Whitehouse S (1998) Reconceptualizing school-based prevention for antisocial behavior within a resiliency framework. School Psychology Review 27(3), 364-379.

Offord DR (1996) The state of prevention and early intervention. In RD Peters and RJ McMahon (Eds) Preventing Childhood Disorders, Substance Abuse and Delinquency. California: Sage Publications.

Patterson GR (1982) Coercive Family Process. Eugene OR: Castitia.

Patterson GR, Chamberlain P and Reid JB (1982) A comparative evaluation of a parent training program. Behavior Therapy 13, 638-650.

Patterson GR, Cobb JA and Ray RS (1973) A social engineering technology for retraining the families of aggressive boys. In HE Adams and IP Unikel (Eds) Issues and Trends in Behavior Therapy, pp.139-210. Springfield IL: Charles C Thomas.

Patterson GR, Reid JB and Dishion TJ (1998) Antisocial Boys. In JM Jenkins, K Oatley and Stein NL (Eds) Human Emotions: A Reader. Malden MA, US: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Rutter M (1983) School effects on pupil progress: Research findings and policy implications. Child Development 54(1), 1-29.

Rutter M, Maughan B, Mortimore P and Ouston J (1979) Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and their Effects on Children. London: Open Books.

Sanders MR and Dadds MR (1993) Behavioral Family Intervention. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Sanders MR, Gooley S and Nicholson J (2000) Early intervention in conduct problems in children. Vol. 3 in R Kosky, A O'Hanlon, G Martin and C Davis (Series Eds) Clinical Approaches to Early Intervention in Child and Adolescent Mental Health. Adelaide: The Australian Early Intervention Network for Mental Health in Young People.

Sanders MR, Markie-Dadds C, Tully LA and Bor W (2000) The Triple P - Positive Parenting Program: A comparison of enhanced, standard and self-directed behavioural family intervention for parents of children with early onset conduct problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68(4), 624-640.

Serketick WJ and Dumas JE (1996) The effectiveness of behavioral parent training to modify antisocial behavior in children: A meta-analysis. Behavior Therapy 27, 171-186.

Taylor TK and Biglan A (1998) Behavioral family interventions for improving child-rearing: A review of the literature for clinicians and policy makers. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 1, 41-60.

Turner KMT, Markie-Dadds C and Sanders MR (1998) Facilitators's Manual for Group Triple P. Brisbane: Families International Publishing.

Walker HM, Colvin G and Ramsey E (1995) Antisocial Behaviour in School: Strategies and Best Practices. Pacific Grove CA: Brooks/Cole.

Webster-Stratton C (1981) Modification of mothers' behaviors and attitudes through a videotape modeling group discussion program. Behavior Therapy 12, 634-642.

Webster-Stratton C (1985) Mother perceptions and mother-child interactions: Comparison of a clinic-referred and a non-clinic group. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 14(4), 334-339.

Webster-Stratton C (1989) Systematic comparison of consumer satisfaction of three cost effective parent training programs for conduct problem children. Behavior Therapy 20, 103-115.

Webster-Stratton C (1993) Strategies for helping early school-aged children with Oppositional Defiant and Conduct Disorders: The importance of home-school partnerships. School Psychology Review 22(3), 437-457.

Webster-Stratton C (1996) Early intervention with videotape modeling: Programs for families of children with oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder. In ED Hibbs and PS Jensen (Eds) Psychosocial Treatments for Child and Adolescent Disorders: Empirically Based Strategies for Clinical Practice. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Webster-Stratton C (1998) Preventing conduct problems in Head Start children: Strengthening parent competencies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 66, 715-730.

Webster-Stratton C and Hammond M (1997) Treating children with early-onset conduct problems: A comparison of child and parent training interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 65(1), 93-109.

Webster-Stratton C and Herbert M (1993) What really happens in parent training? Behavior Modification 17(4), 407-456.

Wierson M and Forehand R (1994) Parent behavioral training for child noncompliance: rationale, concepts, and effectiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science 3(5), 146-150.

Williams A, Zubrick S, Silburn S and Sanders MR (1997) A population based intervention to prevent childhood conduct disorder: The Perth Positive Parenting Program demonstration project. Paper presented at the Ninth National Health Promotion Conference, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.



RSS Facebook Twitter

Sign Me Up for latest release updates

*  Email Address:
    First Name:
    Last Name:
*  I am interested in::





 

Special Issues

Substance Use and Mental Health
Volume 11/1
Summary


Promoting Youth Mental Health through Early Intervention
Volume 10/1
Summary | Contents


Migration and Mental Health
Volume 9/3
Summary | Contents


Families where a Parent has a Mental Illness
Volume 8/3
Summary | Contents


Emotional and Behavioural Problems in Children and Adolescents
Volume 7/1
Summary | Contents


Multicultural Mental Health
Volume 5/2
Summary | Contents


Indigenous Mental Health
Volume 3/3
Summary | Contents


Parenting
Volume 2/3
Summary | Contents


crossref.org - The citation linking backbone



Website by Arrowsmith Websites Sunshine Coast. Business & Government Websites, Social Media, Web Hosting, Domain Names & SEO. Website Design Sunshine Coast, Australia.